Mari Bersama Main Bola Disamping Membina Pendapatan Secara Online

football skills - Zidane, Ronaldo and Ronaldinho

FOOTBALL RELATED TOPICS

FIFA 09 - Chelsea vs. Arsenal

Friday, June 10, 2016

Melissa McCarthy's drops 50 Pounds with this

Celebrity Health Fitness

Melissa McCarthy's 50 Pound Weight Loss Is Amazing: Her Low-Carb Diet Secrets

 

 

Melissa McCarthy, debuted her 50-pound weight loss at the 2015 People's Choice Awards, where she won for Favorite Comedic Movie Actress. McCarthy looked fit and fab after losing weight on a low-carb diet.


 

SEE THE LIST OF INGREDIENTS >>

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The question arises does the tabloid press tells readers what to think in regards of the return to prison of James Bulger's killer? Or is it responding to what they thought already? sensationalist headlines are to blame for inciting the 'baying mob' Law Smoking Hawaii Published: 23, March 2015 Hawaii recently passed a new law concerning smoking, the law makes it illegal to smoke in many public places including all, restaurants, bars, airports, and partially enclosed facilities that are open to the public. This new has made many smokers upset claiming that it takes away their right's but nonsmokers are happy to have a law protect their right to breathe clean air. In order to look at this issue in a rational way one must look at the economics of smoking and of the new law. Hawaii has the 11th highest tax rate per pack of cigarettes at 1.40 per pack (Taxfoundation.org). These regulations are designed to protect nonsmokers from the negative side effects of second hand smoke, but the tax doesn't make that many people quit smoking. According to the book Curbing the Epidemic by the World Bank "researchers have found that a price rise of 10 percent for a pack of cigarettes decreases demand by about 4 percent (an elasticity of -0.4)" this proves that the elasticity of demand for smoking cigarettes is relatively inelastic. So the Government must step in and enforce regulations against smoking. Lady using a tablet Professional Essay Writers Get your grade or your money back using our Essay Writing Service! The new law will make it much more inconvenient for smokers to smoke in public places, the increase in inconvenience is measured as an increase in price, so it will decrease the quantity demanded for cigarettes. Figure-1 illustrates the shift in supply and reduction in quantity demanded, which shows the increased inconvenience. The new law was created inorder to reduce the amount of places that people can smoke thus reducing the supply of places to smoke. The demand for cigarettes is relatively inelastic because nicotine is an addictive substance and there are no close substitutes. According to the World Bank Smoking regulations reduce "tobacco consumption by between 4 and 10 percent, according to various estimates" this is a much greater affect than changing the price of cigarettes. According to Figure-2 the marginal cost to society will be reduced by this new law, it will shift from E-1 to E-2, which will be an increase in cleanliness. This new law will affect the polluters (smokers) by reducing pollution causing activities. Since nicotine is such an addictive substance it will be hard for smokers to quit, therefore the government will have to step in again and offer more nicotine replacement therapy programs such as "Smoking Cessation". This will make it much easier for them to quit smoking because it will provide needed support for smokers. Another long-term implication that this law will have is that it will prevent more people from starting smoking in the first place because fewer children will be exposed to cigarettes and less non-smokers at bars will be around smoking, which is a time when some people would be more likely to take a chance and try something they wouldn't normally do since they would be inebriated. Although many smokers complain about the new law, it will greatly benefit society in the future by protecting our children. A major critique of ethical egoism is that it does not provide a solution for conflicts that arise between competing self-interested individuals. Simply stated, this criticism suggests that our happiness and aspirations often comes into conflict with other individuals (Neyround, 2001). Further-more, this morality should establish rules of conduct that enables the peaceful and harmonious resolution of conflict. However, ethical egoism provides no such rules on principles. Instead, it understands life to consist of a never-ending series of conflicts on which each of us struggle to 'come out on top'. By the nature of police officers everyday work, police officers are routinely placed in situations where personal advantages can easily be furthered through unethical and illegal means. 'Act versus Rule' Utilitarianism (Quinton, 2003) demonstrates an argument of why police officers break the law. Act utilitarianism states and argues that 'ethical' laws are first decide whether public action would be taken if ever they disagreed with the laws were to be enforced upon the public. This is then, in turn, is further decided whether the law generates the most happiness for the public. However, critics of this theory argue that the minority, whether groups or individuals, would then be treated unfairly and biased upon, thus, not an ethical method to follow. This coincides with the notion of corrupt police officers fabricating evidence to convict an innocent civilian. It may please the majority of the population if this civilian was known for criminal acts in the past and present but it doesn't justify the action to wrongly convict an innocent.

No comments:

Post a Comment